Statement Concerning Recent Suspensions
tl;dr -- the magicjudges.org network of sites was suspended in protest of recent actions by Wizards of the Coast. For details, read on.
On December 21, 2015, news broke that Wizards of the Coast had
suspended the DCI memberships of multiple people as a result of a
recent leak of cards from an upcoming set. Among those suspended were
a large number of the leading (L2 and L3) judges of the US Southeast
region. Based on what information has become available since then, it
appears that they were members of a Facebook group to which the leak
had been posted, and that one member of the group made that
information public.
This has caused, to say the least, much concern both within the
judge community and the broader Magic community. On December 22, the
magicjudges.org network of Web sites and services was suspended and
replaced with a message protesting the manner in which Wizards of the
Coast had acted, and criticizing the statements and justifications
given by Wizards of the Coast. I believe the original protest message
has served its purpose of attracting attention to the issue, and I am
gratified to see the messages of support for judges (not merely those
suspended) and of criticism for Wizards of the Coast which have
appeared on many sites and many social-media networks since the
initial protest message went up.
At this time, the magicjudges.org network of sites is returning to
mostly-normal operation, although a prominent link to this message
will be maintained on every page for an extended period of time.
However, I continue to have grave concerns about Wizards of the
Coast's handling of the situation and of the implications it has for
the relationship between Wizards of the Coast and the judge program
and the larger Magic community. A rough summary of those concerns is
as follows:
- In a
statement issued through the Interim Judge Manager, Wizards of the
Coast admitted that suspensions were issued to people who were not
directly distributing or directly engaged in distributing confidential
material. Indeed, it appears that at least some of the suspensions
were given for mere membership in a group to which someone had posted
a spoiler of unknown provenance, and that one or more now-suspended
members acted in good faith and cooperated fully with Wizards of the
Coast upon learning the true provenance. This is deeply troubling, as
even after multiple statements from Wizards of the Coast, no definite
actionable standard has been articulated explaining what any person
— judge or otherwise — could do upon seeing a spoiler of
unknown provenance which would offer them protection from punitive
action by Wizards of the Coast.
- The investigation process appears not to have followed the
standard published guidelines for investigation of misconduct by
members of the DCI; in particular, multiple suspended persons have
claimed they were unaware of the existence of the investigation and
were not invited to give statements prior to being informed they were
suspended.
- The disciplinary process appears (based on information available
to me) to have bypassed both the Judge Conduct Committee (JCC) and the
Regional Coordinator Advisory Committee (RCAC), both of which exist
for the purpose of handling or advising on sensitive cases of alleged
misconduct involving judges.
In an ideal world, Wizards of the Coast would, rather than doubling
down behind vague official statements or dumping news just prior to a
long holiday break (one presumes, with the hope that any criticism
would have blown over by the time the holiday break was over)
immediately take genuine action to respond to these concerns as well
as other valid concerns raised by judges and by prominent players
within the Magic community.
An ideal response would, to my eyes, involve at least:
- Immediately articulating a bright-line standard to which persons
exposed to potential spoilers could refer to determine their
responsibilities and/or liabilities. The community is too large, the
network of discussion sites and groups is too diverse, the amount of
attribution available on the internet is too scarce, to operate under
statements as vague as those provided to date. Any person should be
able to, upon seeing a spoiler of undetermined provenance, immediately
determine whether their having seen it exposes them to risk of
discipline and whether there are actions they can take to demonstrate
good faith and avoid such discipline in the event a spoiler is later
found to have been a genuine leak of confidential information. In the
most ideal of worlds, this standard would be laid out in a manner
legally binding upon Wizards of the Coast and all of its parent and
subsidiary entities, contractors, and representatives. Until such a
standard exists, no member of the community can feel safe or feel sure
of their responsibilities and liabilities, and it should not be
necessary to repeatedly ask, cajole, and even beg for such a standard
to resolve this.
- Immediately placing on hold the suspensions of all judges who were
suspended on December 21, 2015, and restoring them to their
previously-held positions within the program, until such time as the
JCC and/or RCAC can convene to hear their cases and determine a course
of action, with the cases to be heard according to the procedures of
those bodies and with the decisions of those bodies to take precedence
over, and be enacted in place of, DCI disciplinary action imposed
unilaterally by Wizards of the Coast. As both of these bodies are
constituted of trusted senior members of the community, and explicitly
constructed to be able to handle cases involving delicate or sensitive
information, this should not be a concern for Wizards of the Coast and
should, rather, be the natural process to follow as these bodies exist
for the explicit purpose of handling discipline of judges and advising
on actions and relations between Wizards of the Coast and the judge
program.
- If the result of hearing by the JCC and/or RCAC produces a result
of no suspension for one or more of the currently-suspended judges,
Wizards of the Coast should immediately and publicly apologize to
those judges in a forum at least as prominent as that in which the
statements concerning their suspensions were issued, and take other
reasonable steps to clear the names and reputations of those
judges.
In the coming days and weeks I will be continuing to watch the
actions of Wizards of the Coast and its representatives, weighing
their responses to this crisis and making decisions concerning my own
future relationship with Wizards of the Coast and the judge program. I
encourage others to do the same, and if you have criticism I encourage
you to add your voice to those now expressing their concerns to
Wizards of the Coast.
— James Bennett, (for now) L3 and JudgeApps maintainer