Originally posted by Jessica Livingston:You resolve Pithing Needle, naming Jayemdae Tome. I untap, pay 4, tap my Tome and draw a card - then say “oh, crap, I forgot your Needle…”.
In what type of situations would we consider the GRV to have directly led to DEC
Originally posted by Jessica Livingston:As an example, I cast Elvish Visionary for 1W instead of 1G. In this case, I've committed a GRV by casting Elvish Visionary illegally, which led to me drawing an extra card from the resulting triggered ability. So, we will record the GRV as a DEC. However, the fix for this kind of DEC is to backup. We do not make AP reveal their hand so NAP can take a card from it.
But then it brings up another question for me: In what type of situations would we consider the GRV to have directly led to DEC so that this portion of MTR becomes relevant?
Originally posted by Jessica Livingston:
I hadn't actually thought beyond the actual violation to the fixes, but now I'm wondering based on what Nathaniel said.
So to be clear on the fixes: just because the violation is being treated as DEC instead of the GRV or CPV, that doesn't mean we necessarily have to use the DEC fix if the GRV or CPV violation fixes are appropriate?
Edited Chris Wendelboe (Dec. 19, 2015 01:30:21 PM)
You must be registered in order to post to this forum.