Edited Joe Klopchic (Sept. 20, 2018 08:08:14 AM)
Originally posted by Daniel Woolson:
This looks to me like a case of Out of Order Sequencing. Acacia asked Naomi if they had responses before Shardless Agent resolved. Upon NAP saying no, AP began to resolve the stack, starting with the Cascade trigger
Originally posted by Originally posted by Mark Mason:She acknowledged the trigger in resolving it, thus proving its existence in the same way that prowess isn't missed until you assign damage.
if she had acknowledge the trigger in any way
Originally posted by Originally posted by Mark Mason:How do we physically represent the stack vs the battlefield? There is no visible area for the stack and while some players will place a card on the stack in the center between the two players, just as many will place a creature onto the battlefield before it resolves.
she cascaded before moving Shardless from the stack to the battlefield
Edited Daniel Woolson (June 21, 2017 08:57:16 PM)
Originally posted by Justin Miyashiro:
Mark, what indication do we have that Shardless Agent is no longer on the stack?
Sent from my iPhone
Originally posted by Daniel Woolson:Originally posted by Originally posted by Mark Mason:She acknowledged the trigger in resolving it, thus proving its existence in the same way that prowess isn't missed until you assign damage.
if she had acknowledge the trigger in any wayOriginally posted by Originally posted by Mark Mason:How do we physically represent the stack vs the battlefield? There is no visible area for the stack and while some players will place a card on the stack in the center between the two players, just as many will place a creature onto the battlefield before it resolves.
she cascaded before moving Shardless from the stack to the battlefield
Originally posted by Joe Klopchic:
This week we have a Silver scenario, so L2s should wait until Friday to jump into the discussion.
Originally posted by Mark Mason:
I mean acknowledge it “verbally”.
Originally posted by Daniel Woolson:Originally posted by Mark Mason:
I mean acknowledge it “verbally”.
Does the IPG specify that acknowledgments must be verbal?
Originally posted by Lesley Winfield:
The other question is whether Naomi should get a warning for a minor Unsporting Conduct for inappropriately demanding a penalty for her opponent. I feel like Naomi is trying to work the system a bit by using semantics.
Replies have been disabled because this topic is closed.