(42 other cards)
4 Concealed Courtyard
6 Plains
8
4 Gifted Aetherborn
2 Kalitas, Traitor of Ghet
1 Linvala, the Preserver
1 Thalia, Heretic Cathar
2 Anguished Unmaking
3 Fatal Push
2 Flaying Tendrils
2 Fumigate
4 Grasp of Darkness
1 Never / Return
2 Succumb to Temptation
4 Cast Out
3 Gideon, Ally of Zendikar
2 Liliana, the Last Hope
2 Sorin, Grim Nemesis
4 Concealed Courtyard
2 Evolving Wilds
1 Forsaken Sanctuary
6 Plains
4 Shambling Vent
8
SIDEBOARD
1 Blessed Alliance
1 Flaying Tendrils
2 Gideon of the Trials
2 Gisela, the Broken Blade
1 Lay Bare the Heart
1 Never / Return
1 Ob Nixilis Reignited
1 Quarantine Field
3 Scrapheap Scrounger
2 Transgress the Mind
Edited Joe Klopchic (June 29, 2017 03:10:41 PM)
"The Head Judge may choose to not issue this penalty if they believe that what the player wrote on their decklist is obvious and unambiguous, even if it is not the full, accurate name of the card. "
Originally posted by Tristan Hof:
I do not agree with issuing a GL here. Also i want to discuss the Scenario, so here another point of view:
The issue is, the “8” implies that the only Card that could be played in that slot is a basic land. And since the player is playing a B/W Control Deck and has listed no Swamps it is very obvious what they meant. So there is nothing to gain due to writing “8” instead of “8 Swamps”. In that Scenario, if i were the Head Judge i think, i would ask the player first which card was missing, and if they answer Swamp, i would downgrade the game loss to a warning.
Originally posted by Daniel Woolson:
Is there any other card that could even reasonably be in that position though? We know it's a basic land since this is standard and we don't have anything like relentless rats in the format and their other lands are either white or white/black. Of the 6 basic lands, only swamps makes sense since they've already listed plains.
To me this looks like it was clearly supposed to be swamps
The Head Judge may choose to not issue this penalty if they believe that what the player wrote
on their decklist is obvious and unambiguous, even if it is not the full, accurate name of the card.
This should be determined solely by what is written on the decklist, and not based on intent given the actual contents of the deck; needing to check the deck for confirmation is a sign that the entry is not obvious
Replies have been disabled because this topic is closed.