Originally posted by Alexander Csanady:
If you feel that the suggested remedy is not suitable to your particular situation
you may suggest a more appropriate fix which is applied if both players accept it.
Originally posted by Jonathan Johansen:
Maybe the JAR should read “if you feel that there is a more suitable remedy than the suggested alternative” instead. I'm sure there are reasons why it doesn't, but I can't think of any off the top of my head.
Originally posted by Dustin De Leeuw:
you can't ask permission in advance to all possible future opponents of that player.
Originally posted by Milan Majerčík:
Actually, you can. You can arrange an anonymous voting asking everyone in the tournament (and TO as well probably) if they allow the swap.
Originally posted by Dustin De Leeuw:
The line in the JAR regarding if you want to set a heavy-handed tone or not refers to handling missed triggers, not to applying this part of the JAR.
Originally posted by JAR Introduction:
The fixes found in other documents (such as the Infraction Procedure Guide) are designed for a stricter environment and don't apply at Regular REL. In addition to fixing the error, it is important to remind the players to play more carefully. Avoid being heavy-handed as you want to keep your events fun and relaxed.
Edited Tom Wood (July 4, 2019 08:41:06 PM)
Originally posted by Milan Majerčík:
A devil's advocate question: was the intent of the player to include 4 Elvish Mystics in their deck or was their intent to include 4 mana dorks available in the format at the moment?