Originally posted by Alan Dreher:

AP never cast Sign in Blood. He just revealed it. He didn't announce it, he didn't pay for it, he didn't put it in his graveyard… He simply showed it to his opponent.

So… AP wins because NAP gets a game loss for Drawing Extra Cards?

Originally posted by Jochem van 't Hull:

Alan Dreher
AP never cast Sign in Blood. He just revealed it. He didn't announce it, he didn't pay for it, he didn't put it in his graveyard… He simply showed it to his opponent.

So… AP wins because NAP gets a game loss for Drawing Extra Cards?

It's Regular REL, so…. No. It'd be a stern talking to from me if the AP had called me immediately. I'm not gonna give NAP a Game Loss for it here either. I'd rewind, but the game state is destroyed, so I cannot. As such, I'm going to make assumptions and live with the fact that one player won't be happy. In this case, I'm gonna rule that the NAP wins, because the implied sequence of play involved casting Sign in Blood before combat.

Edited Alan Dreher (May 21, 2014 09:30:22 AM)