On 18/08/2014 00:23, Thomas Ludwig wrote:
>
> Upgrading the Warning here feels wrong. The penalties in the IPG are
> set to match the given mistake.
>
> The mistake was resolving a Trigger w/o the Opponent passing priority.
> If there was no cheating involved, this should result in a warning.
>
> Ajani´s Crypt Incursion in Hand has nothing to do with the Emrakul
> Trigger being resolved too fast, if you believe so, DQ Nissa for cheating.
>
> Would you upgrade the penalty if Ajani just had a brainstorm and
> wanted to dig for an answer?
>
> ——————————————————————————–
> If you want to respond to this thread, simply reply to this email. Or
> view and respond to this message on the web at
>
http://apps.magicjudges.org/forum/post/76229/>
> Disable all notifications for this topic:
>
http://apps.magicjudges.org/forum/noemail/11857/> Receive on-site notifications only for this topic:
>
http://apps.magicjudges.org/forum/noemail/11857/?onsite=yes>
> You can change your email notification settings at
>
http://apps.magicjudges.org/notifications/settings/>
After further thought on the matter I think you are right after all how
long does it take Ajani to say STOP. Obviously if he did and Nissa
ignored him that would be a different story. Investigate rule out
cheating issue a GRV warning to Nissa and explain to Nissa to be more
careful in future. Much as we feel an upgrade might be appropriate the
IPG does not appear to support that.
Graham