Handling non-explicit sexism during a judge call.
I'm having a lot of trouble finding the correct words for this post. I want to question to what extend it makes a difference that this particular situation is an example of sexism. However, I am also well aware that such questions are regularly used to dismiss sexism altogether, and it's easy to be perceived as doing exactly that, even when it isn't the intention. That's what most of this thread has been about thus far, after all. It's all made worse by the fact that most of those dismissal attempts are generally surrounded by remarks about how it completely isn't the intent of the questioner to actually dismiss sexism…
I rest easy in the knowledge that the judge program is known as a cult of self improvement. Genuine questions are welcomed, and no attempts to learn something are dismissed. So I will ask my question, knowing that it will be taken as the genuine exploration of the topic of sexism it's intended to be.
Given that, as uncle Scott points out, not respecting the initial judge is a problem regardless of the reasons it occurs, does the fact that the example in the OP is a case of (subconscious) sexism change how you would handle it? What actions would you take if you expect sexism to be the cause of the disrespect, that you wouldn't take if you expected that the disrespect was the result of (for example) the inexperience of the initial judge?