Having a bit of a rules dispute with another judge. Heres the scenario:
Pillar of Flame is cast on a 2/2 creature. The player activates regenerate in response. Now we both agree the creature will be regenerated and remain on the battlefield, the issue we have is whether the pillar's effect could also apply.
Judge A's stance: There is only one replacement effect trying to replace the destruction of the creature and that is the regeneration. Regeneration replaces destruction, so the pillar's effect will never apply.
Judge B's stance: Both the pillar's effect and the regeneration are attempting to replace the destruction, since destruction sends the creature to the gaveyard. However no matter what order they are applied in the creature will regenerate and remain on the battlefield.
So the question is which is the correct replacement effects to apply to the 2/2 in this scenrio?